When God's love encounters our rejection and yet rebounds

Matthew 21:33–46

³³«Listen to another parable. There was a family man who planted a vineyard. He put a hedge around it, dug a winepress into it, and built a tower. Then he rented it to some tenants and went on a journey. ³⁴When the time for harvest came, he sent his servants to the tenants to receive the produce of his vineyard. ³⁵The vineyard workers seized his servants, beat one, killed another, and stoned the third. ³⁶He sent other servants again, in greater numbers than the first time, and they treated them the same way. ³⁷Finally he sent them his son, saying: they will respect my son. ³⁸But when the tenants saw the son, they said to one another, “This is the heir. Come, let's kill him, and we'll have his inheritance.”. ³⁹And having seized him, they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. ⁴⁰Now, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he do to those tenants?» ⁴¹They replied, "He will strike these wretches without pity, and rent his vineyard to other tenants, who will give him the fruit in due season."" ⁴²Jesus said to them, «Have you never read in the Scriptures: 'The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone?' The Lord has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes. ⁴³That is why I tell you that the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people who will produce its fruits. ⁴⁴Anyone who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces, and anyone on whom it falls will be crushed.» ⁴⁵When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard these parables, they understood that Jesus was speaking about them. ⁴⁶And they sought to sixteen him, but they feared the people, who regarded him as a prophet.

A son sent to inspect his father's tenants is killed by them, who hoped to keep the inheritance for themselves. This is the parable of the murderous tenants (Mt 21:33-46): God, the patient owner of a vineyard entrusted to tenants, first sends his servants—the prophets—all of whom are beaten or murdered, then, in an almost naive act of trust, sends his own Son, saying to himself, "They will respect my Son." The tenants, however, see this as the perfect opportunity to seize the inheritance: they throw him out of the vineyard and kill him. Jesus then asks the question that twists the knife in the wound: what will the owner of the vineyard do to these people?

A monk who experienced failure from within

First, we must understand why André Louf, and no one else, could speak of unrequited love with such almost disconcerting composure. He is not a professor of exegesis offering a distant commentary on a difficult parable. He is a man who spent his entire life within a cloister, who for over thirty years bore the responsibility of abbot of a monastic community, and then, at an age when many settle into the trappings of established honors, chose to leave it all behind to become a hermit. This trajectory reveals something essential: the one who speaks of the failure of divine love is not a theorist, but someone who has lived, in the silence of a cell and under the authority of vulnerable men, what it means to love without reciprocation, to hope without guarantees, to begin again endlessly.

The text we are meditating on is taken from a collection of homilies, *Happy Weakness*, published in 1998 by Desclée de Brouwer, and comprising sermons given for Sundays of liturgical year A. These are therefore not pages written for scholarly publication, but words addressed first and foremost to a real community, gathered on a Sunday, with its doubts, its weariness, its questions about God's faithfulness. The very title of the collection—*Happy Weakness*—already announces the paradox that governs all of Louf's thought: it is not despite our weakness that God acts, but in it, through it, sometimes even thanks to it. This is a theme that runs throughout his spiritual work, nourished by the monastic tradition and the theology of grace, but always brought back to the concrete experience of the ordinary believer.

But here is what Louf does in this passage, and what few commentators dare to do: he places God himself in the position of one who hopes, who is mistaken in his hope, and yet who never ceases to love. «They will spare my Son,» God had thought in the beautiful candor of his fatherly love (Happy Weakness, p. 218). This sentence is dizzying if taken seriously. It lends God a kind of naiveté, an almost disarming trust, like a father who cannot believe that his son will be mistreated because he would never harm anyone. Louf is not trying to protect God from an awkward anthropomorphism: he embraces it, because that is exactly what the Gospel parable says, when the owner of the vineyard says to himself, sending his son after so many servants beaten and killed: «They will respect my son.».

And then comes the stark, unvarnished observation: «It was not to be» (Happy Weakness, p. 218). Three words that extinguish all of a father’s hope. The Son came to his own, Louf says again, echoing the prologue of John, but his own did not recognize him, nor the Father’s love that was manifesting itself in him. Herein lies the whole drama: it is not merely a man who is rejected, but a love that is failed to recognize for what it is. And this rejection, like so many others before him, ends in death. Louf says it bluntly: they put him to death as they did so many other messengers of the Father before him, and «once again, for the very last time, love too great ended in failure.».

What Louf sees here, and what other commentators on the parable of the murderous tenants don't always see with such clarity, is that failure is not an accident in the history of salvation: it is its constant, repeated, almost programmatic thread. Before the Son, there were the servants—the prophets—sent one after another, and systematically rejected. Matthew's text is explicit: "The tenants seized his servants, beat one, killed another, and stoned a third" (Mt 21:35). It is therefore not only the Son who is rejected: it is an entire lineage of messengers, an entire history of rejected love that culminates, without ever ending, in the ultimate rejection of the one who bore within him the very likeness of the Father.

What changes when you read about something that takes failure seriously

Love that doesn't calculate its chances

The first thing this reading overturns in us is our idea of a strategic, calculating God, who knows in advance how things will turn out and who would undertake nothing without a guarantee of success. Louf reverses this image by writing that God sends his Son in "the beautiful candor of his fatherly love" (Happy Weakness, p. 218). Candor: the word is strong, almost scandalous when applied to God. It signifies an innocence, an absence of calculation, a trust that does not protect itself in advance against disappointment.

Let's consider an ordinary scene: parents sending their child, alone for the first time, to a group they hope will be welcoming, telling themselves, "Everything will be fine, they'll take him in." They know, deep down, that nothing is guaranteed. But they still choose to trust, because to love, precisely, is to leave oneself unprotected against all risks. It is this same logic, taken to its extreme, that Louf attributes to God sending his Son. This is not a naive God in the sense of being easily fooled, but a God who deliberately chooses not to protect his love through calculation, because calculated love would cease to be a gift.

This perspective changes something about our own way of loving. If we wait, before truly loving someone, for the certainty that they will reciprocate, we will never love fully. Love that protects itself in advance against failure is no longer truly love. Saint Paul, quoted by Louf in this very passage, writes it with extraordinary force: God «so loved the world that he did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all» (Romans 8:32). This verb, «give up,» is the same one used for Judas’s betrayal: God gives up his Son as a man is given over to his enemies. God’s love does not hold back at the edge of the abyss.

The repetition of failure as a divine signature

The second dimension that Louf unfolds, less immediately visible but perhaps even more comforting, is that this story of failure is not isolated: it is the very structure of the relationship between God and humanity, repeated "every day." "This love story, that of the relationship between God and each of us, is always a more or less tormented story" (Happy Weakness, p. 219), he writes, before adding that this story is "punctuated by the many failures that God comes to experience in our lives.".

Here is a scene all too familiar: someone who, year after year, promises to change, to pray more, to return to God, and who, year after year, falls back into the same old ruts, the same distractions, the same silent refusals. One might think that God, eventually, grows weary, or at least lowers his expectations, as a human being might do with a friend who always disappoints. Louf asserts precisely the opposite: this repetition of failures never exhausts God's love, because "God's love is never at the end of its wonders" (Happy Weakness, p. 219). It is not resigned tolerance, but inexhaustible fruitfulness.

This thought finds a striking echo in the words of a Desert Father, Abba Sisoes, in the Sayings of the Desert Fathers, who, when asked what to do after falling into sin seven times in a single day, simply replies that one must rise an eighth time. This is not moral frivolity: it is the recognition that divine mercy has no counter, no threshold of tolerance which, once crossed, definitively closes the door. God, for Louf as for the Desert Fathers, is the one whose patience never tires of beginning anew, precisely because it is not a matter of calculation but of giving.

Weakness turned into victory

The third dimension, and undoubtedly the most central to Louf's thought, is that it is not simply that God endures failure in spite of everything, but that he transforms failure itself into an instrument of his work. "He who transforms weakness into strength, and sin into thanksgiving, and failure into the victory of his love" (Happy Weakness, p. 219). This sentence alone summarizes the entire theology of the cross: what appears as the absolute defeat of God—his Son put to death by his own people—becomes, in the Paschal Mystery, the very place of salvation.

Here we think of a very simple image: a potter whose vase breaks in his hands, and who, instead of throwing away the pieces, reassembles them into a new, different, sometimes more beautiful form than the first. It's not that the breakage didn't occur; it's that the breakage itself becomes the material of creation. Saint Augustine, in a famous sermon, dares an even bolder phrase: "felix culpa," the happy fault, regarding the sin of Adam, which merited such a Redeemer. Louf, a discreet heir to this Augustinian tradition, says much the same thing when he affirms that failure becomes, in God's hands, a victory of his love—not despite the failure, but through it, as if human failure were the precise place where divine love chooses to unfold with the greatest force.

What this meditation leaves within us

What this passage from Louf leaves within us, if we allow it to work its magic, is first and foremost a new way of looking at our own failures before God. We tend to believe that our shortcomings, our repeated infidelities, our abandoned prayers, gradually disqualify our relationship with him, as if each fall widens the gap a little more. Louf reverses this perspective: it is precisely in this space of failure that God continues to love, without exhaustion, without weariness, with the same candor he possessed when he sent his Son. Our failures are not where God's love ends, but where it manifests itself most intensely, because it is there that he chooses again and again to remain.

This reading also offers an invitation to stop judging our own capacity to love solely by the criterion of success. If God himself, in his love for us, experiences failure—a real failure, not feigned, not anticipated by calculation—then our own failed attempts to love, our poorly received acts of charity, our efforts to reach a loved one who eludes us, are not in vain. They are part of the same logic as that of the Father sending his Son: a love given without guarantee of return, and which finds its truth not in the result obtained but in the gift itself.

This thought is not unique to Louf; it extends an ancient and constant intuition of the Christian spiritual tradition, one that sees in the Cross not a deplorable accident but the paradoxical site of victory. From the Church Fathers to the medieval mystics, by way of monastic theology, of which Louf is a direct heir, this conviction has endured through the centuries: God never ceases to love, even—especially—when this love is rejected, and it is from this rejection, embraced to the very end, that the resurrection springs forth.

What remains, then, is a very simple gesture to embrace: to cease measuring our worth before God by the yardstick of our spiritual successes, and to accept being among those whom God continues to love precisely where we have failed to love Him in return. «Truly, this is the Lord’s work all day long, marvelous in our eyes,» writes Louf in conclusion to this page (Happy Weakness, p. 219) — a discreet quotation from Psalm 117, which reminds us that this marvel is not played out in some distant biblical past, but today, in the ordinary fabric of our troubled lives.

Lectio divina

🗺 Map